Jump to content

Talk:Star Wars (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleStar Wars (film) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 25, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 3, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 4, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 7, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 15, 2006Featured topic candidatePromoted
December 3, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
January 14, 2008Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
April 17, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
October 11, 2010Featured article reviewDemoted
August 6, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 25, 2008, May 25, 2009, May 25, 2011, April 17, 2016, May 25, 2017, April 17, 2018, April 17, 2023, and April 17, 2024.
Current status: Former featured article

Inaccuracy in the intro

[edit]

The intro says "Luke Skywalker acquires stolen architectural plans of the Death Star and sets out to rescue her". He sets out to Alderan to deliver the plans to Leia's father. He sneaks aboard the Death Star, finds out she's there, and then sets out to rescue her. 2600:8807:5400:7000:169:3A35:6C8:7ABF (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

[edit]
This article appears to be well sourced but it is in the category "Articles lacking reliable references from March 2024". The B-class criteria (#1) states: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
There are currently eight links in the "External links" section. None is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
Other:
  • External links This page in a nutshell: External links in an article can be helpful to the reader, but they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article. With rare exceptions, external links should not be used in the body of an article.
  • Second paragraph, acceptable external links include those that contain further research that is accurate and on-topic, information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy.
    • Please note:
  • WP:ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them.
I do not see that TCM Movie Database or AllMovie adding anything "extra" according to External links guidelines. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Does anyone know about my edits to this page? Icecreammaniac3.0 (talk) 13:32, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laws in Britain

[edit]

wouldn't say it was laws that meant they had to finish at 5:30pm. Would update this to "Union rules meant...." 217.155.12.96 (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]